Study: Structured homeschooling gets an A+

Montreal, September 8, 2011 — “There’s no place like home,” an iconic line uttered by Dorothy in The Wizard of Oz, might apply to learning the ABC’s, math and other core subjects. A new study from Concordia University and Mount Allison University has found that homeschooling — as long as it’s structured or follows a curriculum — can provide kids with an academic edge.
 
“Structured homeschooling may offer opportunities for academic performance beyond those typically experienced in public schools,” says first author Sandra Martin-Chang, a professor in the Concordia Department of Education, noting this is among the first nonpartisan studies to investigate home education versus public schooling.
 
Published in the Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, the investigation compared 74 children living in Nova Scotia and New Brunswick: 37 who were homeschooled versus 37 who attended public schools. Participants were between 5 and 10 years old and each child was asked to complete standardized tests, under supervision of the research team, to assess their reading, writing, arithmetic skills, etc.
 
“Although public school children we assessed were performing at or above expected levels for their ages, children who received structured homeschooling had superior test results compared to their peers: From a half-grade advantage in math to 2.2 grade levels in reading,” says Martin-Chang. “This advantage may be explained by several factors including smaller class sizes, more individualized instruction, or more academic time spent on core subjects such as reading and writing.”
 
The research team also questioned mothers in both samples about their marital status, number of children, employment, education and household income. The findings suggest that the benefits associated with structured homeschooling could not be explained by differences in yearly family income or maternal education.

Unschooled versus traditional school
The study included a subgroup of 12 homeschooled children taught in an unstructured manner. Otherwise known as unschooling, such education is free of teachers, textbooks and formal assessment.
 
“Compared with structured homeschooled group, children in the unstructured group had lower scores on all seven academic measures,” says Martin-Chang. “Differences between the two groups were pronounced, ranging from one to four grade levels in certain tests.”
 
Children taught in a structured home environment scored significantly higher than children receiving unstructured homeschooling. “While children in public school also had a higher average grade level in all seven tests compared with unstructured homeschoolers,” says Martin-Chang.
 
Public schools play an important role in the socialization of children, says Martin-Chang, “Yet compared to public education, homeschooling can present advantages such as accelerating a child’s learning process.”
 
In Canada, it is estimated that about one per cent of children are homeschooled. According to 2008 estimates from the National Center for Education Statistics, about 1.5 million children in the United States are homeschooled. 

Comments

sonya's picture

Maren's comment sent to the Gazette

Re: “Study supports home learning, if structured” (Friday, Sept 9)

A more accurate headline would have been “yet another study confirms traditional curriculum successfully taught at home”.

The study comparing homeschooled children to schooled children and unschooled children is a typical example of a study with highly predictable results. Look at what is being measured: knowledge of topics usually taught in elementary classrooms, or at the kitchen table in a traditional homeschool setting. Why would anyone be surprised that learners not focusing on these topics, at the same time or in the same order, don’t test as well as learners who do? If I were tested in an area I haven’t experienced or studied, say stoichiometry or animal husbandry or underwater basket weaving, I wouldn’t do very well. However, ask me about something I’ve developed my interests and passions in, and chances are that in those fields, my knowledge would outshine that of others whose time is spent differently.

Furthermore, countless previous studies have amply answered the question of whether homeschooled students are “on par” with schooled students or not (Google Homeschooling Fraser Institute, for example).

A much more interesting study would be one measuring the level of interest students still have in learning at age 15, 18, or 25; or how much students retain and use of what they’ve learned after 5 or 10 years; or the ability of students in various settings to discover their unique gifts and talents and develop them into full-fledged passions to share for the benefit of the greater community; or even comparing how the various educational frameworks foster the creativity and flexibility in thinking that experts agree will be crucial to the success of coming generations.

Isn’t it time to move beyond outdated models of learning and teaching, including many of the “core elements we associate with traditional achievement tests” already, and consider viable options outside the box? Maybe the government prescribed lock-step curriculum isn’t the be-all and end-all, after all. The way we currently measure student success is far too narrow. It’s high time we opened our collective spirit to other alternatives, encouraged diverse forms of learning (in diverse settings for diverse people), and prepared to be astonished by the extent to which young people pursuing their interests will rise to the challenge, when their learning is authentically facilitated and appropriately supported.

Maren Gube
Baie d’Urfé